Former President Donald Trump has proposed a new economic initiative on Truth Social, outlining a plan to fund a nationwide dividend through tariff revenue. In his post, Trump said that under the proposal, “a dividend of at least $2,000 per person (excluding high-income earners) will be paid to everyone.”

How the Plan Would Work
According to Trump’s statement, the concept relies on imposing tariffs on imported goods, then redistributing part of the revenue directly to U.S. citizens. The approach aims to make foreign exporters contribute more to the U.S. economy while channeling the proceeds back to American households.

In his post, Trump defended tariffs as an effective tool for strengthening the economy, writing that critics of such measures are “fools.” He claimed the U.S. is currently “the richest, most respected country in the world,” citing strong market performance and low inflation during his tenure as evidence of the policy’s effectiveness.

However, details of the proposed “American Dividend” remain limited. It is unclear how the payments would be administered or how eligibility would be determined. Possible mechanisms could include direct rebates, tax credits, or healthcare offsets, but no official framework has been released.

What Analysts Are Watching
Economists and policy experts note that while tariff-based dividends are unusual, similar concepts have appeared in debates about resource-driven revenue sharing — such as Alaska’s oil dividend model. Critics caution that broad tariffs can raise consumer prices and disrupt trade, while supporters argue they could strengthen domestic industry and reduce reliance on foreign production.

As of now, the proposal remains a political vision rather than a detailed policy. If implemented, it would represent one of the largest attempts to convert tariff revenue into direct household income in U.S. history.

In essence, Trump’s proposed “tariff dividend” reflects a broader theme in his economic messaging: using national revenue tools to prioritize American households. Whether the plan is feasible — and how it would function in practice — will depend on future policy design, congressional support, and its impact on trade relations.